RE: [PEAR-DEV] New Package Proposal: Enterprise A&A
| From: | Lukas Smith | Date: | Wed, 15 Jan 2003 11:24:29 +0000 |
| Subject: | RE: [PEAR-DEV] New Package Proposal: Enterprise A&A | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-12464@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
> -----Original Message-----
> From: LIMBOURG Arnaud [mailto:arnaud.limbourg@cegetel.fr]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 12:15 PM
> To: Tony Bibbs; Pierre-Alain Joye
> Cc: wolff@21st.de; pear-dev@lists.php.net
> Subject: RE: [PEAR-DEV] New Package Proposal: Enterprise A&A
>
> Catching on the thread (my mail client will most likely start a new
thread,
> thanks to microsoft, i use outlook ;(
>
> If I understood the thread correctly both packages aim in the same
general
> direction. The approach is a bit a bit different in that Enterprise
A&A is
> designed with web-service in mind whereas live user on provides a
general
> framework with a container approach. I believe (from current level of
> comprehension of both packages) that liveuser is more flexible in that
it
> does oblige the end-user to use what containers are provided with it
but
> instead provides the means to easily add almost anything he/she has in
> mind.
>
> Like markus wrote having a web service capability and/or single sign
on
> requires the work of writing the containers (which is quite a lot of
work
> I
> reckon ;). The idea is to keep the same API so the end-user code does
not
> have to change. Web-service containers would also be a great addition
to
> the
> package, providing a rather complete set of containers is a good thing
> imho.
>
> This said I think there could be a merging of efforts, dividing when
we
> could all work together is not the way to go (tm). I have to look at
the
> a&a
> code to see how it is designed, maybe my assumptions were wrong, in
which
> case i apologize ;)
>
> Keep up the discussion, the process might take a while :)
even though competing packages in PEAR are allowed it would be sort of
wacky to have to single sign on packages in pear. However liveuser is
flexible enough that it could actually just access A&A through a
container.
Regards,
Lukas