RE: [PEAR-DEV] New Package Proposal: Enterprise A&A
| From: | Lukas Smith | Date: | Wed, 15 Jan 2003 14:46:13 +0000 |
| Subject: | RE: [PEAR-DEV] New Package Proposal: Enterprise A&A | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-12472@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
> -----Original Message-----
> From: LIMBOURG Arnaud [mailto:arnaud.limbourg@cegetel.fr]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 3:05 PM
> To: pear-dev@lists.php.net
> Subject: RE: [PEAR-DEV] New Package Proposal: Enterprise A&A
>
> > even though competing packages in PEAR are allowed it would be sort
of
> > wacky to have to single sign on packages in pear. However liveuser
is
> > flexible enough that it could actually just access A&A through a
> > container.
>
> I don't understand the first part of the sentence, "wacky to have to
> single
> sign on packages in pear" ??
doh!
What I wanted to say is that it would be wacky to have competing single
sign on classes in PEAR, because that sort of defeats the purpose. Then
again it sounds like both packages could interact via their respective
"container" or "provider" approaches.
BTW: Tony could you quote with a bit more care? Strip unnecessary
information and write your reply underneath what you want to refer to.
Thx
Regards,
Lukas