RE: [PEAR-DEV] New Package Proposal: Enterprise A&A
| From: | Tony Bibbs | Date: | Wed, 15 Jan 2003 14:23:58 +0000 |
| Subject: | RE: [PEAR-DEV] New Package Proposal: Enterprise A&A | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-12469@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Single sign-on in PEAR packages wacky? I'm not sure I understand what you
meant by that. I think a package that aims at supporting single-signon
makes sense in PEAR. I'm sure there is agreement there.
--Tony
On Wed, 15 Jan
2003, Lukas Smith wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: LIMBOURG Arnaud [mailto:arnaud.limbourg@cegetel.fr]
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 12:15 PM
> > To: Tony Bibbs; Pierre-Alain Joye
> > Cc: wolff@21st.de; pear-dev@lists.php.net
> > Subject: RE: [PEAR-DEV] New Package Proposal: Enterprise A&A
> >
> > Catching on the thread (my mail client will most likely start a new
> thread,
> > thanks to microsoft, i use outlook ;(
> >
> > If I understood the thread correctly both packages aim in the same
> general
> > direction. The approach is a bit a bit different in that Enterprise
> A&A is
> > designed with web-service in mind whereas live user on provides a
> general
> > framework with a container approach. I believe (from current level of
> > comprehension of both packages) that liveuser is more flexible in that
> it
> > does oblige the end-user to use what containers are provided with it
> but
> > instead provides the means to easily add almost anything he/she has in
> > mind.
> >
> > Like markus wrote having a web service capability and/or single sign
> on
> > requires the work of writing the containers (which is quite a lot of
> work
> > I
> > reckon ;). The idea is to keep the same API so the end-user code does
> not
> > have to change. Web-service containers would also be a great addition
> to
> > the
> > package, providing a rather complete set of containers is a good thing
> > imho.
> >
> > This said I think there could be a merging of efforts, dividing when
> we
> > could all work together is not the way to go (tm). I have to look at
> the
> > a&a
> > code to see how it is designed, maybe my assumptions were wrong, in
> which
> > case i apologize ;)
> >
> > Keep up the discussion, the process might take a while :)
>
> even though competing packages in PEAR are allowed it would be sort of
> wacky to have to single sign on packages in pear. However liveuser is
> flexible enough that it could actually just access A&A through a
> container.
>
> Regards,
> Lukas
>
>
>
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Tony Bibbs | "I guess you have to remember that those who don't |
tony@tonybibbs.com | hunt or fish often see those of us who do as |
| harmlessly strange and sort of amusing. When you |
| think about it, that might be a fair assessment." |
| --Unknown |
------------------------------------------------------------------------|