RE: [PEAR-DEV] general questions

On Thu, 29 Nov 2001 01:02:14 +0100, Lukas Smith wrote: >To those other reply's to my questions: it really does not make sense >giving me answers like that ('consitency' etc.)... First you asked a question and now you complain because you got answers? ;-). >To the question of keeping two Db abstraction layers or only one: Yes I >think it makes sense keeping only one abstraction layer. And since the >API will have to change for metabase (and this is one of its main >weaknesses) obviously metabase also has a userbase to think off. Please keep backwards compatibility. PEAR DB is already used by a lot of people in production areas. Breaking BC will be the worst thing we can do. Adding new features is OK, but we can't break to much (this does not only apply to BC, but also to performance issues). - Martin -- Martin Jansen, <mail@martin-jansen.de> http://www.martin-jansen.de/