Re: general questions
| From: | Manuel Lemos | Date: | Sat, 01 Dec 2001 01:28:13 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: general questions | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-3257@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hello,
Joao Prado Maia wrote:
>
> On Fri, 30 Nov 2001, Manuel Lemos wrote:
>
> > > So you are saying that a PEAR-DB wrapper will be created on top of
> > > Metabase, so we have all the features quickly. Well, the problem here is
> > > that Lukas Smith doesn't seem too fond of the current PEAR-DB API, as he
> > > described ever so interestingly about his opinions of the fetch*()
> > > methods. If he doesn't do a full port, how is this a real wrapper of the
> > > PEAR-DB API if a lot of its methods are missing ?
> >
> > You got him wrong. He explained that to you. I hope you stop raising
> > objections because you are only stalling the progress.
> >
>
> There is no progress Manuel, please understand this. If he is the one
> doing the wrapper why is this thread keeping him from working ? He can
> work on whatever he wants, and like I told him we will give him the
> suggestions for changes.
There is no progress because you keep raising the same objections based
on your misunderstandings of what people keep trying to tell you that it
is not as you think, but you insist on misunderstanding making people
spend a lot of time replying to you persistent objections instead of
working on making progress in what was proposed.
I don't know what you do for a living, but most of us work, so there is
no time nor patience left to replying to your annoying messages
repeating the same misunderstandings. I don't see any good will on your
part in trying to understand that we only want to have the best for PHP
which in this case is having only one database abstraction layer based
on something that exists today with highly desirable features. If you
disagree, explain yourself and present alternatives to what was
proposed. If you do not have anything constructive to add to the
discussion, don't bug us again with your persistent misunderstandings.
If you want to keep replying to this message just to be the one to say
the last thing, be aware that from now on I am not going to reply to any
messages of yours on this thread. I certainly have better things to do
than to keep replying the same things.
Regards,
Manuel Lemos