Re: general questions

On Fri, 30 Nov 2001 23:10:31 -0200, Manuel Lemos wrote: >Martin Jansen wrote: >> >> On Fri, 30 Nov 2001 03:35:58 -0200, Manuel Lemos wrote: >> >> >Anyway, that was not my point. My point is that you say that PEAR DB has >> >now all the features you want but it was not like that before you >> >realized it needed things like the query limit support. Metabase already >> >had that since almost the beginning 2 years ago. >> >> Manuel, could you please stop promoting Metabase in such a arrogant >> way? It's really getting annoying hearing the same sentence in >> nearly every message from you. > >Have you just arrived to this discussion? No, I have been following it all the time. >I am not promoting Metabase, I am justifying why it it is the best >option to provide the features for a single database abstraction >package as I proposed initially. I'm not against improving PEAR DB with the Metabase features or against merging both libraries (as long as BC is kept). But I think we all got the point that Metabase has features, that PEAR DB does not have -> There is no need to repeat that multiple times. - Martin -- Martin Jansen, <mail@martin-jansen.de> http://www.martin-jansen.de/