RE: [PEAR-DEV] general questions
| From: | Lukas Smith | Date: | Fri, 30 Nov 2001 17:15:41 +0000 |
| Subject: | RE: [PEAR-DEV] general questions | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-3245@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
> How is that different exactly ? I'm saying that you would oppose the
> additions of the fetch*() family and you are talking about the same
thing.
> I do not understand what you mean by a 'core component' though, as we
> didn't even start talking on the design of the wrapper. For all I know
> it's going to be just 1 class ;)
well you said that I would oppose contributions .. which I never said.
Anyways let's make this list a bit more comfy. Somehow I worry about
each little word being twisted around when I post to this list. Then
again a can understand when some people feel like I am intruding on
their 'territory' telling them how to do things. To a certain extend
this is true obviously since I do prefer metabase in a lot of respects
to Pear DB. But I will not take away your choices just a bit of time
when you read my posts. :-)
Well lets then talk about implementation (actually I had a feeling in
some respects this discussion has already started long ago):
I envisioned this framework to be lightweight at the core but extensible
to allow for more "advanced"/"ease of use" features to be implemented.
Those features should not bloat the core. I think a few people already
noted that this is a good direction. Metabase was certainly heading that
way. As I stated earlier the binarycloud people did something in that
direction and Manuel was planning something similar for all the
create/alter functions. I also wanted to add to this SQL functions.
Getting joins to work could also be put in this list (I tend to prefer
subselects because their syntax is more portable).
I think Tomas also said that he had some ideas in mind. Please share
your thoughts.
I agree with John on KISS however I do see the goal of this project to
keep portability above performance. If I feel that certain things need a
speed up I can always make conditional statements in my code or just
make them as none portable and move on.
My 2 cents,
Lukas Smith
smith@dybnet.de
_______________________________
DybNet Internet Solutions GbR
Alt Moabit 89
10559 Berlin
Tel. : +49 30 83 22 50 00
Fax : +49 30 83 22 50 07
www.dybnet.de info@dybnet.de
_______________________________