[PEPr] Comment on RFC::RFC_PackageVariableNamingConvention

From: Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2005 19:10:10 +0000
Subject: [PEPr] Comment on RFC::RFC_PackageVariableNamingConvention
References: 1  Groups: php.pear.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-39223@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Joe Stump (http://pear.php.net/user/jstump) has commented on the proposal for RFC::RFC_PackageVariableNamingConvention. Comment: I totally disagree with the proposal as it stands. One of the following should be used instead: 1.) Allow the developer to decide their variable naming scheme, but force them to stick with whatever they choose. 2.) Keep with studlyCap because this is how the CS says functions must be named. It doesn't make sense to have functions adhere to one standard and variables adhere to another. Proposal information: http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-proposal-show.php?id=282 -- Sent by PEPr, the automatic proposal system at http://pear.php.net

« previous php.pear.dev (#39223) next »