Re: PHP 5
| From: | Wolfram Kriesing | Date: | Sun, 10 Feb 2002 17:27:15 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: PHP 5 | ||
| Groups: | php.pear.dev | ||
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-4565@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Sunday 10 February 2002 18:03, Martin Jansen wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Feb 2002 17:26:35 +0100, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
> >On Sun, 10 Feb 2002 17:20:35 +0100
> >
> >Wolfram Kriesing <lists@kriesing.de> wrote:
> >> if we go for a 2-repository solution, how much extra work does
> >> it mean? does every bug have to be fixed twice? do you have to
> >> check in changes in 2 repositories?
> >
> >yes, IF, then we'll see some MFP1 (Merged from Pear 1) messages,
> > and vice versa, like it works with ZendEngine 1 and 2.
>
> To me that sounds like a little nightmare.
yep,
i also think that it wont work everytime. since we are all human and
may forget a fix some time or copy/paste wrongly:-)
and this would also mean to test twice, everytime....
is by 2 repositories really meant to have 2 seperate CVS repositories
or do we only branch?
is meant to set a tag over all files when we start the PHP5
compatibility conversion and from there on php4 fixes need to be
branched?
--
Wolfram
... translating template system ...
http://wolfram.kriesing.de/SimpleTemplate