Re: [PEPr] +1 for File Formats::File_CSV_Get

kazuyoshi tlacaelel a écrit :

I though we needed to document the package, or is it not the right way to do it? I kind of like that the package ships with compiled documentation though!

Package doc (not phpdoc) must be commited to peardoc cvs module in docbook format, if not, you can provide external documentation (like googlecode) and add the link in your package homepage, in this case I think you can ship the doc with the package, it's ok. But phpdoc generated documentation should *not* be included in the package as it is auto-generated by the pear website.

I also like that peoople can see what is the status of the release by looking a test result logs and stuff, I defenetly feel like removing the phpdoc log!

I don't think users will look at theses log files ;) Also note that pear-qa guys have tools that give stats about coding standards / doc coverage / tests etc... so it's not necessary to provide the logs. -- David