Re: Re: [PEPr] +1 for File Formats::File_CSV_Get

> There is been some discussion with the naming of the methods > I am appending the resolution of those mails below. I am opposed to keeping the aliased method names (uses, symmetry, asymmetry). They're not adding functionality and I think they'll only serve to confuse newcomers to the package. > > Mark Wieseman's Comment: > > > > I share the opinions about the methods naming scheme. I'm also not > > sure whether "File_CSV_Get" is the best name for this package (but > > unfortunately I can't provide a better one at the moment). > > package naming is the real challenge! > anybody has any ideas on this? What about File_CSV_Table or File_CSV_DataSource? Cheers, Mike