Re: Re: [PEPr] +1 for File Formats::File_CSV_Get

Thanks David, Fair enough. I'll remove the documentation and other files from the package. On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 5:42 PM, David Jean Louis <izimobil@gmail.com> wrote: > kazuyoshi tlacaelel a écrit : > >> I though we needed to document the package, or is it not the right way to >> do it? >> I kind of like that the package ships with compiled documentation though! >> > > Package doc (not phpdoc) must be commited to peardoc cvs module in docbook > format, if not, you can provide external documentation (like googlecode) and > add the link in your package homepage, in this case I think you can ship the > doc with the package, it's ok. > > But phpdoc generated documentation should *not* be included in the package > as it is auto-generated by the pear website. > > I also like that peoople can see what is the status of the release by >> looking a test result logs and stuff, I defenetly feel like removing the >> phpdoc log! >> > > I don't think users will look at theses log files ;) > Also note that pear-qa guys have tools that give stats about coding > standards / doc coverage / tests etc... so it's not necessary to provide the > logs. > > -- > David > > > -- > PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > >