Re: [PEPr] +1 for File Formats::File_CSV_Get

Anybody else feels like voting? am waiting for that fifth vote so I can create a todo list. On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 9:47 AM, Kazuyoshi Tlacaelel Tlacaelel < kazu.php@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks David, Fair enough. > I'll remove the documentation and other files from the package. > > On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 5:42 PM, David Jean Louis <izimobil@gmail.com>wrote: > >> kazuyoshi tlacaelel a écrit : >> >>> I though we needed to document the package, or is it not the right way to >>> do it? >>> I kind of like that the package ships with compiled documentation though! >>> >> >> Package doc (not phpdoc) must be commited to peardoc cvs module in docbook >> format, if not, you can provide external documentation (like googlecode) and >> add the link in your package homepage, in this case I think you can ship the >> doc with the package, it's ok. >> >> But phpdoc generated documentation should *not* be included in the package >> as it is auto-generated by the pear website. >> >> I also like that peoople can see what is the status of the release by >>> looking a test result logs and stuff, I defenetly feel like removing the >>> phpdoc log! >>> >> >> I don't think users will look at theses log files ;) >> Also note that pear-qa guys have tools that give stats about coding >> standards / doc coverage / tests etc... so it's not necessary to provide the >> logs. >> >> -- >> David >> >> >> -- >> PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/) >> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php >> >> >