Re: Re: Protect PHP coding
| From: | Manuel Lemos | Date: | Mon, 05 Aug 2002 04:03:06 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: Protect PHP coding | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-111130@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 08/05/2002 12:30 AM, Mark Charette wrote:
That is up to each user. If I ask all users only a part will bother to reply that they liked the classes they used. That does not mean the rest did not like. Anyway, they benefited from the possibility of evaluating them regardless if they use the classes at all.That was not the point of the statement. --- Sure it was. You brought up the numbers to prove a point - to bolster your side with a rhetorical question, but the numbers are suspect; they don't tell us how _useful_ the classes are. In my case, the classes I looked atThe site has about 75,000 subscribers. Could all those subscribers be wrong?The number is misleading. I had to subscribe to see if there was anything worthwhile. That doesn't mean anything was.
left too much to be desired to be useful, but perhaps other classes on there _are_ useful - I just didn't need them at the time. You've created aYou may have not liked at all of any of the classes but the fact that you had access and actually evaluated the classes is because like the rest of the 75,000 subscribers you were allowed to share the know how that the respective authors provided in their classes. Some classes may not provide great know how in your opinion but you got that benefit because you wanted, not because you had no choice.
repository - for that I thank you - but to imply that the number of visits or downloads or subscribers = the number of people actually using the classes is disingenuous at best.You are mistaken, I am not talking about visits. I am talking about people that subscribed to the site, ie, subscribed by submitted their e-mail address in the subscription page, so they did not just look at the pages like any wanderer. -- Regards, Manuel Lemos