RE: [PHP] PHP Editor
| From: | Roy Nasser | Date: | Wed, 01 Nov 2000 19:47:04 +0000 |
| Subject: | RE: [PHP] PHP Editor | ||
| Groups: | php.general | ||
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-23209@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
I dont want to be leeched or anything,
but i have a Windows 2000 Server running on a P533, with 256mb RAM, as a
workstation (I ues it as my development machine) and i keep it running for
weeks without a reboot... i basically only reboot it when i install new
software....
I do however use only *NIX based servers because our experience with NT was
hhhmm... how can i say... "not the best"...
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeff Stuart [mailto:jstuart@ohio.risci2.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2000 4:41 PM
> To: Sander Pilon; jeremy@nirvani.net; Michel Polotto; Roy Nasser;
> php-general@lists.php.net
> Subject: RE: [PHP] PHP Editor
>
>
> While I did not mean to start a holy war here...I challenge
> you to keep a
> windows box up and running WITHOUT a reboot for more than 2
> weeks. (Oh, and
> the box has to be doing something other than just sitting
> there. IE it's
> either acting as some kind of server, or else it's being used as a
> workstation. It won't happen.)
>
> Now my PERSONAL preference is not for VI but for Emacs but that is my
> PERSONAL preference. While I will joke with those VI
> barbarians (:)), I do
> agree that Unix is the way to go. If I could only find an
> HTML editor that
> was like DreamWeaver for Unix, I'd switch in a heart beat. :)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sander Pilon [mailto:sander@3dnews.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2000 7:31 PM
> To: jeremy@nirvani.net; Jeff Stuart; Michel Polotto; Roy Nasser;
> php-general@lists.php.net
> Subject: RE: [PHP] PHP Editor
>
> >
> > I think us VI people and _you_ emacs :) people should agree that
> > getting people out of whatever the heck they are running on
> > Windows and into EITHER vi or emacs is a step in the right
> direction.
> >
> > :)
> > -jeremy brand
>
> If you think 30 years back in time is the right direction, sure.
>
> :)
>