Re: future of PEAR

Hi Björn Schotte, you wrote: > Hi, > > * Michael Wallner wrote: >> http://cvs.php.net/cvs.php/peardoc/en/authoring > > That's nothing appropriate. Well, you're most probably right. As far as I can say PhpDocumentor seems to be the right way in the future. Perhaps it will generate peardoc2 compatible output in one of the future versions - it mostly does even yet. >> When making docs - I think - it's the easiest way to look how >> others have done this before. > > That's not appropriate. The easiest way (especially regarding the > recent PEAR2 discussion) is IMHO to provide access and tools to the > developer where he can easily start with. Name it whatever you want > - "A dummy's guide to PEAR", "PEAR SDK", whatever. I think ATM such kind of a guide should exist for new users of PEAR and *especially for hosters and ISPs*. I also think that the number of PEAR devs is not the real matter, but appropriate QA is. >> Questions about Docbook can be most probably best answered here: >> >> http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/docbook/chapter/book/docbook.html > > I know how to write docbook (I'm using XMetal for that), but that's > not the point here. Sorry, but I wasn't talking about you - just generally. Regards, -- Michael - < mike(@)php.net >

Attachment: [application/pgp-signature]