Re: Discussion of SCM_SVN Proposal

On 4/15/04 7:14 PM Pacific Time, Jon Parise (jon@php.net) wrote: > Your SVN package provides a solid interface to Subversion. It > scratches your itch and I presume it's working well for you. That's > the code that's being proposed here, and I support its introduction > into PEAR. Thanks, Jon -- I appreciate your support of the package. > The one scenario I would *not* like to see coming out of all of this > is the creation of a brand new SCM package that competes with Horde_VC > (because that would just be wasted effort). Ideally, your SVN code > gets folded into Horde_VC (which is then released via PEAR) or the > Horde_VC_svn driver becomes reimplemented using your SVN package. Ideally, yes -- if it worked out that way, that would be great. : ) I'm glad it seems a consensus is emerging on the value of a low-level SVN API for PEAR. Thanks for your input, and if you get a chance, I welcome any other comments/suggestions you may have on the way I've put the SCM_SVN package together. Regards, -Clay -- Killersoft.com