Re: Discussion of SCM_SVN Proposal

<jon@php.net> wrote : > On Sun, Apr 18, 2004 at 08:32:24PM +0200, Bertrand Mansion wrote: > >> So my rant was not against Horde, but rather against the way you guys tried >> to force a developer to rewrite his code to use one of your package, which I >> didn't want because this move would limit the proposed package features and >> because IMO things should be done the other way round. > > None of us ever suggested that Clay be forced to rewrite his code to > use one of our packages. That kind of statement is inflammatory, so > please be more careful with your choice of language, Bertrand. Please remember that what takes you two seconds to write takes me five minutes in English. So I am as careful as I can. > To be clear (for posterity's sake), all that we (Horde) were asking is > if Clay would consider merging his work into the Horde_VC package. So, are you going to ask this for every proposal or is it just that one ? Manuel Lemos used to do the same on every occasion, I don't see any good out of that. > He said he wasn't interested, and that was fine. No, people actually insisted even after Clay said no. > A second discussion erupted concerning the creation of a Horde_VC-like > package that would be developed natively in PEAR, and that's where > things got hairy. This second thread had nothing to do with Clay's > original SCM_SVN proposal, and I'm sorry he was dragged into it. Indeed. Bertrand Mansion Mamasam