Re: Discussion of SCM_SVN Proposal

On 17 Apr 2004 at 9:43, Clay Loveless wrote: > On 4/17/04 5:43 AM Pacific Time, Stefan Neufeind (stefan@neufeind.net) > wrote: > > > I know that Horde is open towards PEAR and that the collaboration is > > good. So I can't see why we shouldn't take the offer and try to make > > Horde_VC (if needed a bit more pear-ified) part of PEAR. Horde could > > still use the PEAR-package and ship it with their apps. And as soon > > as channels become available they can even add a dep to the PEAR-code > > *and* their Horde-packages. > > Stefan, as Chuck as already indicated earlier in this thread .. > [...] > > So, it doesn't sound to me like Chuck is interested in using SCM_SVN > directly. As he said, it's open source, and he can crib ideas as he chooses. Well, that's what he said, yes. But there is already SVN-code in Horde_VC, as it has been mentioned in the thread as well. And it's also been mentioned that they had a hard time making the source as good as it is today. So maybe adopting Horde_VC into PEAR would be a good first step, and then you could help improving the SVN-part of Horde_VC? This would imho be fine with Chuck - he just doesn't want "another layer" ... so to say SCM_SVN and an abstraction-layer above it all - which I can pretty much understand. Stefan