Re: Discussion of SCM_SVN Proposal

Hello, Am 16.04.2004 um 10:46 schrieb Clay Loveless:

Thanks, Chuck -- at this point, I also feel a standalone package is the best way to proceed. Sorry about ruffled feathers, if any -- they were not intentional!

I've had a look into the package and I only can say, that I like this approach ;)

I welcome any comments you (or anyone else) may have about my implementation of SCM_SVN thus far.

I would very much appreciate a more modular layout of the inner workings, because I see great potential in this architecture. Some points about that: - having a driver structure for different SCM systems is quite nice - associated with that would a plugin-structure for the output-parser (no other SCM system I know throws out XML) - I would volunteer for integrating other SCMs I have experiences with (CVS, ClearCase, Surround SCM, Perforce ...) I totally agree, that this package and all work done for that will have no negative interference with horde/chora. Having a write-enabled SCM package would be _very_ cool for creating web based development tools, automatic staging tools etc. Having this in combination with PHP-GTK or other GUI systems would make it possible to create tools implementing mechanisms like checkin triggers in ClearCase - written in PHP *wow* So from me, it's definitely a +1 ;) Best regards, Volker Goebbels -- Dr. Volker Göbbels vmg@arachnion.de Arachnion GmbH & Co. KG http://www.arachnion.de Sandkaulbach 4 Tel. ++49 (0) 241 5591106 52062 Aachen Fax ++49 (0) 241 5591107 Besuchen Sie uns auf dem Linux Tag in Karlsruhe! http://www.linuxtag.org