Re: Discussion of SCM_SVN Proposal

From: Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2004 18:43:55 +0000
Subject: Re: Discussion of SCM_SVN Proposal
References: 1 2  Groups: php.pear.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-27938@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Sun, Apr 18, 2004 at 08:32:24PM +0200, Bertrand Mansion wrote: > So my rant was not against Horde, but rather against the way you guys tried > to force a developer to rewrite his code to use one of your package, which I > didn't want because this move would limit the proposed package features and > because IMO things should be done the other way round. None of us ever suggested that Clay be forced to rewrite his code to use one of our packages. That kind of statement is inflammatory, so please be more careful with your choice of language, Bertrand. To be clear (for posterity's sake), all that we (Horde) were asking is if Clay would consider merging his work into the Horde_VC package. He said he wasn't interested, and that was fine. A second discussion erupted concerning the creation of a Horde_VC-like package that would be developed natively in PEAR, and that's where things got hairy. This second thread had nothing to do with Clay's original SCM_SVN proposal, and I'm sorry he was dragged into it. -- Jon Parise (jon@php.net) :: The PHP Project (http://www.php.net/)

« previous php.pear.dev (#27938) next »