Re: Discussion of SCM_SVN Proposal

On Thu Apr 15, 2004 at 11:4146PM +0200, Bertrand Mansion wrote: > <mj@php.net> wrote : > > > I do not think there is much overhead: All Horde packages in the > > framework/ directory already seem to be "pearified". So packaging them > > is more or less only a matter of running "pear package" in the right > > directory. In the end the only difference would be that the source code > > is not kept on PHP's CVS server but on cvs.horde.org. > > > > Merging your code into Horde's codebase sounds like *the* way to go for > > me. Having two version control packages with nearly exactly the same > > features would be a pity. > > I don't understand why Clay should adapt his work to Horde when Horde is not > in PEAR ? Could you let me know the idea behind that. If I remember correctly someone from the Horde team (Chuck?) said that they are willing to "contribute" all the code to PEAR that is located in their framework/ directory in CVS. Thus merging code with existing Horde code does definitively not mean that there is no chance to release it in PEAR. -- - Martin Martin Jansen http://martinjansen.com/