Re: Discussion of SCM_SVN Proposal
| From: | Alan Knowles | Date: | Fri, 16 Apr 2004 13:49:57 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Discussion of SCM_SVN Proposal | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-27775@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Chuck Hagenbuch wrote:
Quoting Tobias Schlitt <tobias@schlitt.info>:This does make sense.. - although the Category should not really be abbreviations eg.(Conf), or acronims (VCS), good clear names I'm not sure about the 100% category -> prefixing The category is for pearweb really.. - the prefixing is more to prevent use killing the global class namespace. Regards AlanNo, please start naming correctly in the manor of <Category>_<Packagename>. There will be an RFC for correct naming today evening.Then there needs to be many, many more top-level categories. Making Tools_ a part of a bunch of classnames is just plain silly.
-chuck -- "Regard my poor demoralized mule!" - Juan Valdez-- Can you help out? Need Consulting Services or Know of a Job? http://www.akbkhome.com