Re: Re: PEAR's Error Handling and PHP5
| From: | Pierre | Date: | Wed, 21 Jun 2006 20:49:00 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: PEAR's Error Handling and PHP5 | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-43071@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi,
On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 22:22:17 +0200
elias0@gmx.net (Patrick Müller) wrote:
>
> Pierre wrote:
> > The timing is good but the time is bad. People not active in PEAR
> > try to tell us what to do and are partially the cause why this list
> > is more a flame factory than what it should be, a source of
> > inspirations.
> >
>
> Good morning Pierre,
>
> isn't discussing ideas also contributing?
Discussing yes, pointless flames/fuds/attacks no.
> can't a pear user suggest a way to make using pear for him better? do
> you only respect people (or their opinion) that have hundreds of bug
> reports or commits in cvs?
You are putting words in my mouth. I consider opinions or decisions
made by people actually doing something for PEAR. That does not mean
having commited hundred of patches and reported many bugs. People
knowing me know how much I appreciate people helping PEAR or its
users.
As a sidenote, in case you did not notice, only PEAR developers can
actually have a word at the end, and that has nothing to do with me.
However you are missing my point and my targets. By "not active", I mean
people only popping in some rare occasions, basically only in such
topics without actually being active in the community in general (dev
or not).
If you feel like I was talking about you in particular when I said that
then sorry, but that was not the case. I remember some of your posts,
you proposed patches or package (btw, where ended your benchmark_timer
proposal?), ideas, etc. and all in a constructive and respectful
manner, and in a relatively short period.
Cheers,
-- Pierre