Re: Re: [PEPr] Comment on Web Services::Services_Digg

From: Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 17:28:13 +0000
Subject: Re: Re: [PEPr] Comment on Web Services::Services_Digg
References: 1 2 3 4  Groups: php.pear.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-46366@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Doesn't 5.2 have some feature HTTP_Request can make use of ? I'm kinda against the whole idea of making v2 just for the sake of E_STRICT :) Or has PEAR people changed their view on that since last year ? - Helgi On 4/22/07, David Coallier <davidc@php.net> wrote:
What about I make HTTP_Request2 php5 ? I could pull it out today I don't mind.. shouldn't take that long anyways.. and when there's a change to HTTP_Request (fix/features/etc) I sync them... Let me know what you guys think. On 4/22/07, Gregory Beaver <greg@chiaraquartet.net> wrote: Alexey Borzov wrote:
Alexey Borzov (http://pear.php.net/user/avb) has commented on the
proposal for Web Services::Services_Digg.
Comment: The package may not have HTTP_Request as a required dependency since HTTP_Request is not a E_STRICT compatible package, see http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-proposal-show.php?id=419
There is no E_STRICT alternative to HTTP_Request, I strongly recommend we allow dependencies on older packages when there is no alternative. Greg -- PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php -- David Coallier, Founder & Software Architect, Agora Production (http://agoraproduction.com) 51.42.06.70.18 -- PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php


« previous php.pear.dev (#46366) next »