Re: Re: [PEPr] Comment on Web Services::Services_Digg

On 4/22/07, Mark Wiesemann <wiesemann@php.net> wrote:

David Coallier wrote: Well then we'll wait after the elections as the elected will have to decide upon rules for the rules and way of proceeding with pepr, new packages (refactored to php5) etc. I have a running version now of HTTP_Request2 but yes, Net_Socket & Net_Curl are php4, thus stopping us from going further. Let's put that discussion on hold until after the elections. David, Alexey is the maintainer of HTTP_Request. Why don't you try to get together with him to make a E_STRICT solution for Joe's problem?

Yes I know, that's why I proposed to find a plan off list :) And I am writing another email atm to discuss about the issue with him.

PEPr-ing or GROUP-ing this issue is not the way to go here. As Alexey said, he is willing to "cooperate" and to provide help. A v2 of a package is always something that the maintainer has to decide. Only if he isn't active anymore, the PEAR Group should decide something about a v2.

Was my point, but it sounded arsh (which I am sorry for), Alexey, I'm sending you an email to discuss about what we could do for Joe, and my main problem was that we could come up with a solution and then have it changed later by the pear-group. Anyways, back to other email :)

Regards, Mark -- http://www.markwiesemann.eu -- PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

-- David Coallier, Founder & Software Architect, Agora Production (http://agoraproduction.com) 51.42.06.70.18