Re: Re: [PEPr] Comment on Web Services::Services_Digg

Hi Joe, Joe Stump wrote: > 3.) I still don't see how this effects Services_Digg (PEAR_Error will > be converted ASAP to PEAR_Exception) as HTTP_Request isn't available > in any tangible way to the users of Services_Digg. I can switch out > to Net_Curl2 or HTTP_Request2 at any point in the future without > breaking BC on Services_Digg. So, while I do see the point of the > RFC, I don't see how it really applies in this situation. Services_Digg can only get into PEAR if it is E_STRICT compatible, which is the point of the RFC. That means that not only the package needs to be E_STRICT compatible, but also all packages it depends on. While you depend on HTTP_Request (in the current available version), your package can't be accepted if we don't want to break the rules. Regards, Mark -- http://www.markwiesemann.eu