Re: Re: PHP 5.0.0 Beta 1
| From: | Stan Lemon | Date: | Mon, 30 Jun 2003 01:13:16 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: PHP 5.0.0 Beta 1 | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.pear.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-general+get-6312@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Could be. All I'm saying is I have a feeling that's the part of the license they are having a conflict with.
Regardless... This brings a *serious* issue up for PHP, especially since mySQL is so common amongst open source developers. Unless there is some change it makes me hesitant to PHP5.
- Stan
Eric "e-dawg" Johnston wrote:
But PHP is Open Source. Might it be due to Zend? On Sun, 2003-06-29 at 18:56, Stan Lemon wrote:I am assuming the following: 3. Commercial use for everyone else b) If you include one of the MySQL drivers in your non Open Source application (so that your application can run with MySQL), you need a commercial licence for the driver(s) in question. The MySQL drivers currently include an ODBC driver, a JDBC driver and the C language library. Robert Cummings wrote:I read the licensing information in the above link, but I'm curious what exactly in it necessitated the need to unbundle MySQL? Anyone have a quick answer? Cheers, Rob.