Re: Package proposal: Mail_Mime (alternative)
| From: | Stefan Neufeind | Date: | Fri, 15 Aug 2003 09:04:10 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Package proposal: Mail_Mime (alternative) | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-19803@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 15 Aug 2003 at 10:45, Heino H. Gehlsen wrote:
> > >
>
> http://www.heino.gehlsen.dk/software/temp/Mail_MimeAlternative-0.0.0.1
> .tgz > > What's the difference to the current Mail_Mime?
>
> Ups, sorry - I might have been kind of late ;)
[... following was an explaination of the features of the new class
...]
Well, but raising the usual question: How about BC? Haven't yet found
the time to take a look at the source - but is it backward-compatible
to the current Mail_Mime? The problem is that you can exchange an
existing package with braking all the current scripts using the "old"
/ current one.The proposed features and the extensability seem quite
interesting and might be a good solution (depending on the
implementation-details). But again: BC is a MUST in this case.
Stefan