Re: Package proposal: Mail_Mime (alternative)

> I asked Richard to review your code. Thanks, then I'll just drop the draft I was working on ;) > I think you'll get his opinion during the next days and tomas will be back later next week. Then I can only wait and hope they'll have in mind, that it's an early proposal, which I would not even consider alpha state yet, when they do their reviews... > You may look at the 2.0 folder in the Mail_Mime cvs folder, it's a > rewrite of Mail_Mime, experimental. I allready have looked it through - the code is 6½ months old, and actually looks like an abandoned atempt to move forward - the main focus still seems to be on the composer class (the decoder is actually missing), not the entity/part class which I believe ought to be in focus...