Re: Package proposal: Mail_Mime (alternative)

> > You may look at the 2.0 folder in the Mail_Mime cvs folder, it's a > > rewrite of Mail_Mime, experimental. > > I allready have looked it through - the code is 6½ months old, and actually > looks like an abandoned atempt to move forward - the main focus still seems > to be on the composer class (the decoder is actually missing), not the > entity/part class which I believe ought to be in focus... The composer class is merely a nice frontend to the MimePart class, which is necessary to make the whole thing usable to folks who have simple needs. The MimePart class could be used by itself if so desired, giving your entity/part focus. Certainly the code in the 2.0 subdirectory needs completing, with things like separated out base64/7bit/8bit/qprint classes and a header class, though I feel this is the way to go as it's very mature code and a core part of PEAR. Cheers -- Richard Heyes V-webmail - http://www.v-webmail.org