Re: Package proposal: Mail_Mime (alternative)
| From: | Derick Rethans | Date: | Sat, 23 Aug 2003 10:34:25 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Package proposal: Mail_Mime (alternative) | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-20434@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Thu, 21 Aug 2003, Greg Beaver wrote:
>
>
> Martin Jansen wrote:
>
> > On Thu Aug 21, 2003 at 07:3307PM +0200, Heino H. Gehlsen wrote:
> >
> >>>PEAR is not a framework.
> >>
> >>I believe PEAR's own website has another opinion about that ;)
> >>
> >>On the frontpage of pear.php.net the following quote can be read: "What is
> >>PEAR? [...] PEAR is a framework and distribution system for reusable PHP
> >>components."...
> >
> >
> > Framework relates to the installation infrastructure, not to the
> > packages. If that is unclear, we should possibly rephrase the sentence.
>
> I think Heine's point is that it would benefit PEAR to have explicit
> support for multiple pear-style servers, to allow installation from
uh-huh. I think this is a good idea because it would also allow other
project (such as horde) to set up their own server.
Derick
--
"Interpreting what the GPL actually means is a job best left to those
that read the future by examining animal entrails."
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Derick Rethans http://derickrethans.nl/
International PHP Magazine http://php-mag.net/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------