Re: Play nice! Re: Savant/Flexy/Foo template engines
| From: | Tomas V.V.Cox | Date: | Thu, 10 Jun 2004 10:36:18 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Play nice! Re: Savant/Flexy/Foo template engines | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-30379@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Alexey Borzov wrote:
Hi, Tomas V.V.Cox wrote:Yes, that's why they would hardly get deprecated in a quite ammount of time. But with the time, if a "dominant" package lands with success, the common case is that this occurs. Before this RFC, PEAR accepted a package "forever", now we're trying to limit the infinite. Tomas V.V.Cox PS.- Seems that was no clear enough in the RFC that ALL the points are requirements.Trying to do this now (the news server is not too responsive). I don't think that *any* of the PEAR's template engines qualify: - No reachable maintainer or agreement from him - No package maintance in one year (CVS commits and releases) - Lots of bugs open (a rule of > 2 bug each 10,000 downloads), this point is optional, only increases the chance.Do we have a procedure for removing the packages, BTW?Feel free to follow the topic "Deprecation Handling RFC" at PEAR-QA.