Re: Comments on bugs marked bogus

On 7/26/05, Alexey Borzov <borz_off@cs.msu.su> wrote: > Scott Mattocks wrote: > > From > > http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-proposal-show.php?id=60 > > "If any QA related issues are found in a package that QA has not been > > granted permission to change without consulting the maintainer,the QA > > team will file a bug report. If the issue remains unresolved for 1 month > > (2+1+1 weeks; see below), QA may fix it themselves." > > In case you don't actually have a clue. The issue *is* resolved: the bug is > closed as Bogus since January because the bug is not within QuickForm, but > within the __autoload() code. > > > The current maintainer is recommending hackish fixes and supressing > > errors instead of fixing the current code. I would much prefer to keep > > my code clean and readable. If you cannot or will not resolve this issue > > please let me know. > > I would prefer you keeping your code clean and readable by removing any > references to QuickForm from it. You may also consider forking, but I honestly > doubt you have the necessary skills to maintain a fork. > Alexey, stop nit-picking on stupid non-related issues. Explain why this bug will not be fixed from a technical perspective and we'll leave you alone. Saying that PHP is broken and/or this is a PHP bug is not sufficient. Saying that you don't like how the user is using the function is not sufficient. A small, non-intrusive change should not be causing this much crap. With the time you're spending writing all of these hurtful messages you could have comitted the fix and and probably fixed a few more bugs while you're at it. -- Justin Patrin