Re: Comments on bugs marked bogus

Alan Knowles wrote: >> But I don't want to fight windmills. So the question really is whether we want >> to allow the use of __autoload() with PHP knowing that, like magic_quotes, it >is >> not a good practice, or if we simply don't care. This decision will have >> consequences on at least 50% of our packages, especially the big ones. >> >> The issue in HTML_QuickForm will be fixed when the RFC will be proposed and >> approved by all. > >I guess if you are not willing to go with a pragmatic 'I'll fix a change >request for case senistive is_a()'s , then someone who wants this change >doing an RFC is really the only option, but it does seem alot of fuss >over a tiny issue... Sure we will fix it, the issue is also present in other parts of the code, so we will fix it there too before the next release. But as you said, the problem is really with __autoload() and fixing QuickForm won't fix __autoload() problems with PEAR in general. That's why an RFC seems necessary. I am asking for it but I can't write it myself. I just hope someone will find some time and motivation. If some of the guys who want this to be fixed because they use __autoload() could write such an RFC, that'd be even cooler. :) Bertrand Mansion Mamasam