Re: Re: [binarycloud-dev] Re: [PEAR-DEV] Re: [metabase-dev] RE: [PEAR-DEV] New Metabase Aniversary release

From: Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 21:09:04 +0000
Subject: Re: Re: [binarycloud-dev] Re: [PEAR-DEV] Re: [metabase-dev] RE: [PEAR-DEV] New Metabase Aniversary release
References: 1 2  Groups: php.db php.general php.pear.dev php.pear.general php.windows 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-4074@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Hi, This discussion is interesting to me because I joined this list to find out answers to these questions. Currently, we are working on a codebase for use with Indymedia websites (http://www.indymedia.org/) which can be seen at http://tech.sfimc.net/ The point is to develop a set of classes which can be reused to building Indymedia sites. Part of that includes a db abstraction class and a template class. I came here to find out if we should be moving towards PEAR's equivalent classes. But now I don't know. So, is PEAR an application framework (which is what I would call what we are doing)? Or can someone explain the difference between a framework and a "pool of classes that follow coding standards"? Thanks, gkd Björn Schotte <bjoern@baer.main.de> said: > Remember, PEAR ist not Midgard. PEAR is no application framework. > It's a pool of classes that follow coding standards.

« previous php.pear.dev (#4074) next »