Re: [binarycloud-dev] Re: [PEAR-DEV] New Metabase Aniversaryrelease

Hello, Alex Black wrote: > > >> I will first focus on the functional aspects, then step by step making > >> the necessary changes to make that final code compliant to the PEAR > >> coding standard. > > This makes no sense for PEAR. > > > > I propose this way: > > 1. pearize Metabase (functionNames, using PEAR_Error) > > 2. commit the stuff to PEAR > > 3. create a wrapper class matching PEAR::DB > > I agree with all but 3. Metabase offers a superset of the functionality > available in pear, so the exiting API must be extended to support metabase's > additional functionality. > > otherwise, Lukas, fantastic and I await your work... we will be using your > code in binarycloud as soon as it's ready. > > Manuel: will you mintain metabase based on Lukas's work? i.e. is he taking a > branch or are you working together? (I hope it is the latter... as I would > really like to see the metabase code adhere to the pear coding standards). Of course, it was my proposal to have one and only one database abstraction package, remember? :-) Regards, Manuel Lemos