RE: [PEAR-DEV] Re: [metabase-dev] pearifying metabase: phase 1

Hi, well in the versions I have released so far I have begun moving to PEAR error handlers directly. Even though some of the stuff I am doing can certainly be done nicer I will improve those parts as I learn more about the the exact behavior of each of the Db abstraction layers. Right now I am not taking full advantage of the PEAR error handling but I will do so in the near future. Anyways I am also just playing with things here just to see what method is the better one. I have not gotten any comments on my work so far but I feel it allready proofs that it is doable so now I will focus on trying to find the best interrim solutions that can be used until there is a C port. I want this interrim solution to be good and actually a superset of the features of PEAR DB and Metabase. I also want to keep BC. So anyways I am not working on a wrapper around Metabase anymore but more in a merged version that people would want to use in production use but also keeps BC. For this I am taking a look at how PEAR DB and how Metabase solve different things to try and extract the optimal one. In some cases PEAR DB and Metabase are similar and in others they take very different approaches. Best regards, Lukas Smith smith@dybnet.de _______________________________ DybNet Internet Solutions GbR Alt Moabit 89 10559 Berlin Germany Tel. : +49 30 83 22 50 00 Fax : +49 30 83 22 50 07 www.dybnet.de info@dybnet.de _______________________________