Re: Re: [metabase-dev] RE: [PEAR-DEV] New Metabase Aniversary release
| From: | Björn Schotte | Date: | Wed, 23 Jan 2002 07:07:56 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [metabase-dev] RE: [PEAR-DEV] New Metabase Aniversary release | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-4097@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
* Manuel Lemos wrote:
> > No fear, Manuel. I didn't say that Metabase should not
> > be PEARified.
> You did not seem to agree to have only one database abstraction package
> in PEAR either.
If you would have read my e-mails carefully, you would have
the answer. I don't think it's a good idea to follow the
dictatorial way of "There's only place for the one and only
DB abstraction layer".
But, as I said, it's only *my* opinion.
> One point that I need to make clear is that I definetely did not make
> that proposal because I developed Metabase, but rather because PHP can
> only benefit from having only one officially advertised database
> abstraction package like Java for JDBC.
Why can it only benefit from having only one DB abstraction
package? Why can't it also benefit if there are many DB
abstraction packages?
--
PHP-Schulungen in Frankfurt und München!
Mehr Informationen? >>> mailto:bjoern@thinkphp.de