RE: [PEAR-DEV] [rfc] permissions managment

That is just a documentation thing. To ensure that we have separate docs for simple and complex. Simple from a programming point of view will just be an xml file with the necessary configurations or even better will be the default for complex. All features that "make" it "complex" will have to be enabled. Regards, Lukas > -----Original Message----- > From: robert janeczek [mailto:rashid@ds.pg.gda.pl] > Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 5:55 PM > To: pear-dev@lists.php.net > Subject: Re: [PEAR-DEV] [rfc] permissions managment > > > I want the "complex" perm class (aka LiveUser) to offer it's features in > > layers. And this is quite possible. Therefore "complex" will sort of > > include "simple". > > > > This would have the advantage of making it easy so grow. > > So I don't really see much reasons to have a separate "simple". > > the main reason of my proposition of simple perm class is that it should > be > easy to administrate. do you think your class could do that? i know that > the > most complex class can make everything that simpler ones can, but have in > mind php developers who will be using it - i would be scared if i would > want > to write simple web site and have to use your administration page (or > write > my own). so - let`s create something really simple where is no need for > such > complex solutions. > > rash > > > > -- > PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php