Re: [naming] permissions managment

<smith@dybnet.de> wrote : >>> Does this mean we all agree to put this user class into the Auth >>> category ? >> >> This is a tricky one. >> >> What the class can do is: >> - User management (add/edit/delete users) >> - Authorization (user login management) >> - Permission/ACL management >> >> So the possibilities I see are: >> - User_LiveUser >> - Auth_LiveUser >> - Perm_LiveUser >> > > As I wrote earlier we have no other choice but to name things randomly, > because if we put "information" (like "complex") in the name we might > have issues when a new package comes along. > > LiveUser is fine. > > So split the package into the above mentioned three packages. > Name the Container subdir "Container" and not "Containers" and lets be > done with it. I am against splitting, it just creates confusion. I think we need a new category, User, and put LiveUser (or whatever) into it. Bertrand Mansion Mamasam