Re: "waldschrotts guide to nifty references" - manual page draft, version 0.9b

From: Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2000 20:16:53 +0000
Subject: Re: "waldschrotts guide to nifty references" - manual page draft, version 0.9b
References: 1  Groups: php.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to php-dev+get-29712@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
What for? Refcounting is not visible from userspace in no way, why do you need it in the manual?
It´s an interesting fact for switchers and experts, I don´t think it´s a good idea to hide all technical details, we´re open source so why we´re closed technology
Calling existing PHP manual "few" is a huge underestimate, IMO. But let's not bring there everything and the kitchen sink. Manual should be just reference, not all-about-the-subject tutorial.
You just said. It´s reference ;) reference for technical details IMHO, a manual should contain as much useful information as possible like lars says...
I agree--there are lots of things about the language that don't really need to be explained right in the manual itself. Although an appendix may not be a bad place for this sort of thing, along with the extension programming notes and other things that 99.7% of users won't ever need to know.
-- o----------0-¬---------O-·---¬----o---®-----o o O ° . | http://www.kiffen.de | pRoteçt y0ur bRaín |0 O ° ¤ ° · 0°·³°²'²³-¹'³´³°^°³~³²³°'³²²¨³²^³¹³²°²³`³º³°Þ ° o © ° . · | psychedelic experience | gott@kiffen.de | O ° o ° o-¬--o--0-----©-·--O-----o-----0-¤----------o 0 ° · ° . ¤ ·

« previous php.dev (#29712) next »