Re: "waldschrotts guide to nifty references" - manualpage draft, version 0.9b

> I don't see the added value of tutorials inside the manual. I'm not saying > that there mustn't be any tutorials in the manual, the world won't come to > a bitter end if there are; But it should be fairly clear that this is not > what the manual is about. Unlike a function and a language reference, > which isn't even attempted by any other site, there are plenty of (good) > tutorial sites. A first step would be linking them promptly from the > manual. If a member of the doc team writes a tutorial and decides he wants > to publish it at no other place than www.php.net instead of on one of the > tutorial sites, we can add it there, but I don't see any reason to > encourage this (as in, the resources of the doc team should go mostly all > towards the function/language reference). Well, let's leave this up to the documentation team. This is a volunteer effort. They work on what they feel like working on. If they feel like working on tutorials, they will work on tutorials, if they don't, they won't. This isn't about encouraging them to do one thing or another. This is about not saying no to a contribution just because it happens to look more like a tutorial than a function reference entry. -Rasmus