Re: "waldschrotts guide to nifty references" - manualpage draft, version 0.9b

> Why do it? Other sites invest tons of time (and sometimes money) to do > just that. There's no reason to compete with them, because you can't > invest as much time into this, and you shouldn't have to. Invest time at > what you're good at, which is an accurate description of the > language. Link other sites for tutorials. Why not leverage the power of > hyperlinks? We have a bigger documentation team now than any of the other sites out there. We have the resources and the structure to do a very good job on this. The more examples we can put into the documentation, the better, and if somebody wants to write some full tutorials, I see no reason for not including them as long as they don't get in the way. That is, they would be put into the appendix or into a separate chapter so as to not interfere with the concise function reference. -Rasmus