Re: "waldschrotts guide to nifty references" - manualpagedraft, version 0.9b
| From: | Ron Chmara | Date: | Sun, 20 Aug 2000 03:18:03 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: "waldschrotts guide to nifty references" - manualpagedraft, version 0.9b | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-dev+get-29762@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Zeev Suraski wrote:
> De-facto, the manual has always been treated as a reference manual, and not
> a user's guide.
Perhaps that may have been a part of the original intent, but looking through
the annotations, there is a clear and definite need for an online user's
guide of some kind, and php.net/manual/ has already *become* that guide. Most
sections which did *not* have basic code tutorials now have them added in via
the annotations. If there was no basic tutorial in a given area, one has been
added by the manual users.
What other reason would there be for including user submissions? For correcting
the stray typo between returning 1 or 0? The everyday users of the manual have
been using it to share complex examples, to give basic tutorials on using the
functions, to share information on why to use one function or another. Since
there are no online user guides available, the manual has now become the users'
guide.
> I don't see tutorials being a part of it ever; Many
> people have written good tutorials, and we never thought about importing
> them into the manual, which is good.
Many tutorials would be too large, and too complex. However, I think we
need to differentiate between "any form of a tutorial" and "a complex,
comprehensive, tutorial for every single function".
> Would you expect to see tutorials in
> UNIX man pages? Neither would I.
I expect the following in man pages, which is *not* currently part of all
of the PHP documentation:
Usage/Syntax
Verbose Usage <-Tutorial info
Verbose Explanation of all options <-Tutorial info
Examples of many options <-Tutorial info
History <-Tutorial info
Changelog <-Tutorial info
Cross references to similar and inverse functions <-Tutorial info
What many of the PHP pages currently have is equivalent to only five to
ten lines of a man page.
There is also a reason that many beginning Unix developers scoff at man pages
and go to online websites, or buy books.
Is there a reason to *not* want www.php.net/manual/ as one of the websites
that they go to?
-Erratacrawlerbop
--
Brought to you from iBop the iMac, a MacOS, Win95, Win98, LinuxPPC machine,
which is currently in MacOS land. Your bopping may vary.