Re: "waldschrotts guide to nifty references" - manualpage draft, version 0.9b

> At 21:15 21-08-00, rasmus@lerdorf.on.ca wrote: > >We have a bigger documentation team now than any of the other sites out > >there. > > How would you know that? Because I have talked to most of them and am helping a couple of them. > > We have the resources and the structure to do a very good job on > >this. The more examples we can put into the documentation, the better, > >and if somebody wants to write some full tutorials, I see no reason for > >not including them as long as they don't get in the way. That is, they > >would be put into the appendix or into a separate chapter so as to not > >interfere with the concise function reference. > > I see no reason to step into something that's already covered by so many > other sites. Link them. Keep the manual elite in what it is. This whole > business sounds as if we're competing with other sites, when we really > aren't. What does it matter whether it's it on php.net or on another site? This isn't competition. This is additional information. There is no such thing as too much documentation as long as it is well organized. And often it does matter as people look at php.net first, then ask. Cutting down on the number of questions is a good thing. -Rasmus