Re: Why PHP ? part 2
| From: | Michael Kimsal | Date: | Sat, 09 Dec 2000 23:13:07 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Why PHP ? part 2 | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-29510@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
One more followup:
I've not seen any good templating methods in ASP.
IIS5/ASP3 might resolve that, and the server.excute method
would probably allow for more templating flexibility, but nothing
like Perl or PHP templating systems exist, to my knowledge.
Yes, someone will say 'I saw X on site Y', but there's not an
industry-supported templating standard in use on NT sites.
The MS 'webclass' thing is interesting, but too slow for
production machines needing speed.
Also, my own observations were backed up by an MCSE at a
local MS shop - ASP is more and more being used as the glue
for COM objects, for performance reasons. So you not
only need to know enough VB to put together the framework,
you then need VB or VC knowledge to compile your code into
fast libraries. This *may* not be as necessary under IIS5,
but many places are already moving in that direction, and
have money invested in that method, so it may continue
even if it's not necessary performance-wise.
Yes, it's all anecdotal, but... the only 'official' stats you'll get are
from MS marketing anyway. Unless you can find some MS shops willing
to be honest and frank with you. I don't think you'll find too many -
not at the high level. No exec that's just pushed their company into
a strategic direction towards MS, thereby committing untold $
(millions?) towards MS methods, is going to say 'I made a mistake'.
They'll bite the bullet and make the IT people jump through hoops
to get it work, come hell or high water.
And I've seen people on the non-MS side do the same thing. When
an MS product made sense economically, people still wouldn't use it,
preferring instead to roll their own. Long term, that may still be
the best decision, but it's often hard to separate long-term thinking
from short-term knee-jerk reactions. Even if it's not knee-jerk,
some people will think it is.
Good luck!
Jeff Demel wrote:
> We all now that, huh?
>
> Again, WHY does it suck? What's wrong with VBScript? It is VBScript, not
> Visual Basic that ASP uses, but remember you can also use PerlScript,
> JScript or any other language you want (as long as there's a scripting
> module for it). You could probably even use PHP, if you had the desire to
> write your own module. But what's important here, I think, is providing
> specific examples of why one should choose PHP over ASP/VBScript or
> whatever.
>
> So let's get down to nuts and bolts and specific examples.
>
> -Jeff
==========================
Michael Kimsal
http://www.tapinternet.com
PHP Training courses
http://www.tapinternet.com/php
734-480-9961