RE: [PHP] Why PHP ? - devil's advocate
| From: | Maxim Maletsky | Date: | Mon, 11 Dec 2000 02:25:27 +0000 |
| Subject: | RE: [PHP] Why PHP ? - devil's advocate | ||
| Groups: | php.general | ||
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-29619@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
In fact it was:
it contains all the technologies of NT including everything that was never
possible to include in it, due the bugs.
If these bugs were resolved, let's say, 3 years ago then we would have Win2K
in commerce yet in 1998.
No, wait....
We are forgetting what the word *commercial* means....
Sorry, I made a mistake it would still be released in 2000, since 98 was
already selling WELL, .. in fact so well that they even released 98 *sEcOnD
EdItIoN*
how sweet....
that's my whole point.
P.S: I don't work at Microsoft, but used to work at Intel, I met some people
from MS and heard many entertaining stories from then.
P.S2: About Win2K release: I read it somewhere a year ago. I think you can
find few articles about what I was saying here if you'd search AllTheWeb
well.
Cheers,
Maxim Maletsky.
-----Original Message-----
From: Jason Murray [mailto:Jason.Murray@melbourneit.com.au]
Sent: Monday, December 11, 2000 11:17 AM
To: Maxim Maletsky
Cc: php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: RE: [PHP] Why PHP ? - devil's advocate
> 1. Microsoft Software is NEVER perfect: Win2k is its ever successful
> edition, and guess what: it was invented 5 YEARS AGO and released as a
beta
> only in 99. And now guess why? Because it had TOO MANY bugs in it and no
one
> to fix'em. Of Course, Jesus Christ: you gotta pay all these semi-sick
> programmers to make that HUGE OS run.
That's taking the anti-MS sentiment a bit too far, IMHO.
Windows 2000 is just NT5. I don't think it was invented 5 years ago, as that
would place it in parallel development with Win95.
Jason