Re: Re: PHPUnit development moved out of PEAR
| From: | Pierre | Date: | Thu, 06 Jul 2006 11:56:07 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: PHPUnit development moved out of PEAR | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-43279@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 7/6/06, Lukas Smith <lsmith@php.net> wrote:
Martin Jansen wrote: On Thu Jul 06, 2006 at 10:1820AM +0200, Pierre wrote:As a side note, as far as I rembember, there was a request that QA should write down this doc. Or it was proposed that pear QA should do it. It made sense back to the early days of QA, a bit less now. Any volunteer to finally write this doc and put in the manual and in the set of RFC (I would prefer to have them all in the manual, RFC are temporary docs, they must be moved to the manual)? --PierreJust wondering: Is this rule written down somewhere? No, but I think it was more or less accepted rule at this point, leaving the option open for examination on a case by case basis.Yes we have rules like not allowing external dependencies if they are not optional.