Re: What's up with pear?
| From: | Christian Dickmann | Date: | Fri, 14 Feb 2003 11:24:39 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: What's up with pear? | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | Groups: | php.pear.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-general+get-3758@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
"Till Dawn" <naturalkiller@gmx.net> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:20030212202856.12932.qmail@pb1.pair.com...
>
> > It would be great, if you could provide the output of go-pear
> > so that I am able to see where exactly the problem occurs.
> >
>
> OK now the most detailed Error-description I'm able to do.
>
> I'm running Win2000, with php 4.3 as module on a apache 2.0.43 + mysql.
ok. the important part is the same for me ...
> Are there some extensions, I have to enable to use go-pear? Zlib or stuff?
Please take a look at phpinfo(); is zlib loaded?
My 4.3. has zlib included.
> E:/bin/php => set as PEAR_EXTENSION_DIR
> E:/httpd/htdocs/
> E:/httpd/pear => set as PEAR_INSTALL_DIR
> E:/httpd/manuals/pear/docs => set as PEAR_DOC_DIR
Can you please try c:\ instead?
> And the go-pear settings
>
> Installation prefix = E:\httpd\htdocs\admin\go_pear
see above.
> Which leads to following error:
> ++++++++++++++++++
> Starting installation ...
> [Downloading works fine]
> Extracting installer.................. Invalid checksum : 38744
calculated,
> 2826 expected
> Warning: unlink(C:\\WINNT\\TEMP\gop3CD.tmp\PEAR) [function.unlink.html]:
> Permission denied in E:\httpd\htdocs\develop\admin\go_pear\go-pear.php on
> line 793
>
> Warning: rmdir(C:\\WINNT\\TEMP\gop3CD.tmp) [function.rmdir.html]:
Directory
> not empty in E:\httpd\htdocs\develop\admin\go_pear\go-pear.php on line 797
>
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> How and why is go-pear trying to unlink something in my WINNT directory?
On
> the other hand didn't I configure him to use the path set under "PEAR
> Installer cache directory"?
Thats the download dir, where the downloaded files are stored
temporary. its your systems preferred temp dir.
> I hope this error-report can help you. However, why is there a checksum
> anyway? Is it for security reason? If so may I switch it of?
It checks if the package is corrupted. In your case it seems to be
the case.
> Your Till Dawn
Thanks for your input!
Christian Dickmann